Page 1 of 1
BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:40 am
by Rocky
Should I get battlefield: bad company or call of duty 4?
Or simply wait for one of the games coming out in the next month or two
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:58 am
by Ogrish
i sujest renting them, and playing them.
I just beat bad company, its ok. Cod was harder to beat.
If your going for multiplayer, i like the controls on bad company.
{Insert advertisement for Gamefly here}
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:06 am
by Dragonfire
*off topic*
My roomate just beat Crysis Warhead in 7hrs on Normal
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:10 am
by Zieon Eslador
Dragonfire wrote:*off topic*
My roomate just beat Crysis Warhead in 7hrs on Normal
I don't see any connection to the topic. Don't we have a certain thread for this in the cafe?
*And go for GoW 2, I no nothing about BF and BC but I hated CoD4.
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:04 am
by Dragonfire
I'm just stating that Warhead is fun to play and all, but very short campaign, maybe get it for the map editor or somethin'...
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:23 pm
by DemonicSandwich
Why get Call of Duty 4? Personally I like the game but if you want a COD game wait till mid November because COD5 comes out then.
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:42 pm
by Eaton
Get Bf: Bad Company if you like total destruction and a 90% destructible environment. The multiplayer is very fun as well. Call of Duty 4's campaign was very epic and is worth every penny. But the multiplayer isn't the best.
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:40 pm
by NotZachary82
Meh. Both.
Re: BF: BC or CoD4
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:22 pm
by Rocky
The only problem I have with bad company is that it supports only one person on the console, but I'll most likely go with that, thanks guys!
As for warhead, I'll most likely get that sometime in the future. Although crysis "wars" is not necessarily my favorite since they took out the lean... lame!